In this group, the USA is the largest payer (for 2020 and 2021 each just under 116 million US dollars)

In this group, the USA is the largest payer (for 2020 and 2021 each just under 116 million US dollars)

Due to the mismanagement of the WHO and their reliance on information from China, the epidemic has worsened dramatically and spread globally.

Over the next 60 to 90 days, his government will examine what role the WHO has played in the “” poor handling and cover-up of the spread of the coronavirus “”. That is how long the payments would be on hold.

TRUMPS DESTRUCTIVE REVIEW

Trump presented his criticism of the WHO for almost ten minutes. “” One of the most dangerous and costly decisions by the WHO was the disastrous decision to oppose travel restrictions from China and other countries, “he said. “Fortunately, I wasn’t convinced and stopped traveling from China, saving countless lives. Thousands upon thousands of people would have died. “” At the end of January, the United States banned foreign travelers from China. On the other hand, other countries followed the recommendations of the WHO and thus “” accelerated the pandemic around the world, “claimed Trump. “” The decision of other big countries to keep travel open was one of the great tragedies and missed opportunities in the early days. “”

THE ATTITUDE OF WHO

The WHO had not officially recommended trade and travel restrictions during the crisis, among other things with reference to the impending interruption of aid transports and because of negative social and economic effects on the countries affected. At the beginning of March, WHO emergency aid coordinator Michael Ryan said that, if necessary, drastic measures such as in China or Italy – where freedom of movement was already restricted in severely affected regions at the time – could at least slow the spread of the disease. In this context, travel restrictions are a sensible tactical strategy.

MORE REVIEW AND A LOOK BACK

Trump also complained that the WHO had failed to review information from Beijing critically and promptly. Instead, she took China’s assurances at face value and even praised the country for its “so-called transparency”. The late declaration of a health emergency “cost valuable time”. With faster intervention by the WHO, the epidemic could have been limited to its place of origin with a few deaths, Trump claimed. “That would have saved thousands of lives and prevented global economic damage.” “Trump had previously praised China’s handling of the outbreak several times. In a January 24 tweet, for example, he wrote: “” China has worked very hard to contain the coronavirus. The United States appreciates your efforts and transparency. “”

Distraction

The WHO is a welcome scapegoat for Trump. He himself came under severe pressure during the crisis. The Republican had long publicly downplayed the danger of the coronavirus. He is now being accused of having reacted too hesitantly to the outbreak, leaving the United States largely unprepared for the epidemic.term paper on community service The chairman of the US House of Representatives, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, complained that Trump was warned of the pandemic in January, but “” ignored these warnings, took inadequate measures and caused unnecessary death and misfortune “”. Up until the beginning of March, Trump had asserted that the virus was not a cause for concern for the United States, and declared: “We have tremendous control over it.” “The United States is now the country with the most proven infections and corona deaths worldwide.

DRASTIC MEASURE AT A TROUBLE TIME

The WHO reacted with regret to Trump’s announcement and called for solidarity in the fight against the virus. WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in Geneva: “” If we allow ourselves to be divided in the fight against the corona virus, the virus will exploit these rifts. “” The organization must now examine which areas are affected by the defaults and how possible funding gaps are closed could become. Trump’s move also met with a lot of criticism internationally: UN Secretary General António Guterres warned that it was “” not the time “” to reduce resources for the WHO or other organizations in the fight against the virus. Moscow condemned Trump’s move as “” selfish “”. The Chinese government expressed “” seriously concerned “”. The French government and the head of the African Union commission called Trump’s plans regrettable. Germany’s Foreign Minister Heiko Maas (SPD) also criticized the payment stop: “” Reciprocal accusations do not help in the Corona crisis, “” he told the dpa.

WHO’S BUDGET

The WHO is the United Nations’ most important specialized agency in the health sector. According to their own statements, less than a quarter of their budget consists of mandatory contributions from the member states. The amount depends on the country’s prosperity and the size of the population. In this group, the USA is the largest payer (for 2020 and 2021 each just under 116 million US dollars). The majority of the WHO budget comes from voluntary services. They are raised by states – in addition to the mandatory contributions – as well as by foundations, international organizations and companies. These fluctuate annually. According to the latest information from the WHO, the USA voluntarily contributed around 281 million dollars in 2018, compared with around 401 million in the previous year. How much the US government wants to cut was initially unclear.

THE PANDEMIC OUTBREAK AND THE WHO’S REACTION

On December 31, a notice from the health commission of the Chinese metropolis of Wuhan announced that a mysterious lung disease had broken out in the city. The WHO found out about it on the same day. Chinese authorities retroactively dated the first infection to an earlier point in time. There was also early evidence that the virus is transmitted from person to person. At the end of January, the WHO declared the outbreak a “” health emergency of international concern “”. On March 11, she classified the spread of the virus as a pandemic.

Brandenburg’s Prime Minister Woidke has asked the Polish government to reconsider the strict closure of the border with Germany. There had previously been demonstrations in both countries.

Brandenburg’s Prime Minister Dietmar Woidke (SPD) has asked Poland to relax the strict corona rules for commuters who work in Germany. “From my point of view, commuters should have the opportunity to come to their workplaces on the other side of the border”, wrote Woidke, who coordinates German-Polish cooperation for the German government, to the Germany coordinator in Poland, Bartosz Grodecki. He advocated pragmatic solutions if the restrictions were extended. The “” Märkische Oderzeitung “” from Frankfurt (Oder) reported about it on Saturday.

The national conservative government of Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki closed the borders to foreigners in mid-March in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic. Commuters have to go into domestic isolation for two weeks after their return to Poland. According to the chambers of industry and commerce (IHK) in southern and eastern Brandenburg, more than 25,000 commuters in Brandenburg and Berlin are affected. Brandenburg supports the commuters financially.

Several hundred people demonstrated

On Friday evening, both sides protested against the border closure at the German-Polish border. In the neighboring town of Zgorzelec in Görlitz, around 300 people took to the streets, reported the PAP news agency. In the border towns of Slubice near Frankfurt (Oder), Rosowek in West Pomerania and Gubin in Lower Lusatia, there were demonstrations with more than a hundred participants each. According to the police, the protests were calm. “The region is divided in half, which makes life very difficult for many people in the border area,” said Marta Szuster, a spokeswoman for the protests in Rosowek, the news agency. In Frankfurt (Oder), according to police, around 50 people demonstrated against the closure of the Polish border, including schoolchildren and commuters. This demonstration also ran smoothly.

Easing of corona measures: Austria pushes border openings No to mutualisation of debts: Chancellor continues to reject EU bonds

In the letter to Poland, which is also available to the German Press Agency, Woidke continued: “” The German side understands the border controls that Poland has introduced. But we also have to keep an eye on the fact that the border cuts through a common economic region. “” Last weekend, when the Germany coordinator was appointed in Warsaw, the head of government advocated that the partnership would not be damaged by the corona pandemic.

Sources used: dpa news agency

Washington (AP) – Confusion about the regular press conferences of US President Donald Trump in the Corona crisis: The spokeswoman for the White House, Kayleigh McEnany, announced that Trump would go ahead on Monday at 5 p.m. (local time / 11 p.m. CEST) kick the media.

T-Online.de/TV
Influencer (30) dies in butt lift
Elephant cow gives birth – the behavior of the herd is incredible
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast
What are the chances of a white Christmas?
Santa Claus approaches with a sledgehammer
Hunter discovers lynx – and records exciting scene
Why the situation in Saxony is getting worse

The White House had initially announced a press conference for this time on Monday, but then canceled it. McEnany now wrote that Trump’s appearance in the White House rose garden will be about additional guidelines for coronavirus tests and “” other announcements “” to reopen the economy.

Trump had questioned his regular press conferences during the weekend’s corona crisis. What is the use of holding press conferences in the White House when the media “” poses nothing but hostile questions then refuse to report the truth or facts exactly, “” he wrote on Twitter on Saturday evening. “” They have record ratings the American people get nothing but fake news. “” It’s not worth the effort. No press conferences were held on Saturday and Sunday.

Trump has held press conferences almost every day since mid-March, some of which lasted longer than two hours. Journalists were able to ask him extensive questions. Because of verbal attacks on some media representatives, controversial, sometimes false statements and a lot of self-praise, Trump was increasingly criticizing his appearances. At the press conference on Thursday, Trump encouraged researchers to examine ways of injecting disinfectant into people in the fight against the virus. He caused widespread outrage. On Friday he tried to capture what he said and said it was just “” sarcasm “”.

Erfurt (AP) – While the political quake in Thuringia is forcing the CDU leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer to resign, the parties in Erfurt are struggling to find a way out of the government crisis.

T-Online.de/TV
Nursing home action causes a stir
Macron reports from quarantine with a video message
MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag
Trump casino is blown up – who can push the button?
Permissive Insta-star dies after cosmetic surgery
Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast

After the shock of the first few days, the parties are catching up with the old problems: Left, SPD and Greens want to elect the left-wing politician Bodo Ramelow as prime minister, but do not have an absolute majority in parliament. CDU and FDP refuse to vote for Ramelow.

The conflict between the bourgeois and the center-left camp in Thuringia is to be tackled on February 17th at a meeting with the CDU, as representatives of the Left, SPD and Greens announced. There is also an offer to talk to the FDP. However, it remains completely open whether a solution can be found.

Ramelow confirms once again: “” I am politically ready to take responsibility and I put out my hands in the direction of the CDU and FDP. “” In view of the increasing demands from the federal government for quick new elections in Thuringia, he warned against a stalemate for months if the state parliament is to be dissolved immediately. Ramelow said anyone who is now preparing a state election with a managing minister-president and thus accepts 70 days in which there is no state government is politically irresponsible.

Left, SPD and Greens want to first elect Ramelow as Prime Minister in Thuringia and only later – maybe – prepare new elections. But even with the first planned step there are tough conflicts. The Thuringian CDU does not want to actively vote for Ramelow, but rather does not want to prevent his election by abstaining. Representatives of the Left, SPD and Greens, on the other hand, insist on an absolute majority for the 63-year-old. This would require 46 votes in the first ballot. The Left is therefore demanding a commitment from the CDU that four or five of its MPs will vote for Ramelow to ensure that he is not hoisted into office with the help of AfD votes.

However, a CDU party conference resolution forbids any cooperation between the Christian Democrats and the left and the AfD alike. Thuringia’s CDU General Secretary Raymond Walk called for a debate about it. The decision forced the CDU into “” a straitjacket “” and into “” a vice, “” said Walk. SPD state chief Wolfgang Tiefensee argued that the CDU had broken its decision at least once in the election of the prime minister. In this election, the CDU made common cause with the AfD.

In the end, CDU boss Kramp-Karrenbauer also stumbled over the conflict in which the Thuringian CDU finds itself. She announced on Monday that she would be renouncing the candidacy for chancellor and party leadership. According to information from party circles, with a view to the government crisis in Thuringia, there was “” an unresolved relationship between parts of the CDU and the AfD and the left.